- #Do i need all the bfme 2 patches install
- #Do i need all the bfme 2 patches update
- #Do i need all the bfme 2 patches software
- #Do i need all the bfme 2 patches code
I wouldn’t even mind that… but some of those patched aren’t really patches after all… but complete implementations of the 2.0+3.0+3.5 pyramid. NET security patches that issue forth from Redmond Where I disagree with Leo’s “just-leave-them-there” advice is that they are notoriously insecure, as evidenced by the endless stream of.
Here is the way it works as I understand it: As Leo has pointed out, they do NOT supersede each other - in other words, if a program required V2.0, then uninstalling 2.0 will break that program.
#Do i need all the bfme 2 patches code
I use Windows Vista Home Premium and the Error Details line for the repeated installation failure states this: Code 643.įor most of us, the.
#Do i need all the bfme 2 patches update
NET Framework 2.0 SP2 Security Update was successfully installed as well as other updates, by the same process of Windows Automatic Updates. I also feel important to add that on the same date (). My question is, why is this Security Update systematically failing installation? It started around the same time I upgraded to NIS2010.I wonder if it has anything to do with it? I checked and I have already installed in my system: v, v, v7, v3.0 and v.3.5 and was ready to uninstall them all but the last one, until I came to “ask Leo”… Good thing I did, once again. NET Framework 1.1 SP1 Security Update (KB953297), every single day, and each time the installation fails. Starting, Windows Automatic Update keeps trying to install. He has saved me headaches and possible loss of files and/or even my system, time after time… Rumors are that the mess will get cleaned up in a future version,įirst of all, I must give my sincere thanks to Leo. Spend a lot of time experimenting ( back up first!), just leave them Yes, they eat up moreĭisk space, but unless you really know what you’re doing or want to
#Do i need all the bfme 2 patches install
If you install version N+1, version N remains.īut the solution is simple: leave them there.
#Do i need all the bfme 2 patches software
In fact, you’ll already note that while most software NET framework version 1 might not work if only version 2 The prior versions are no longer necessary.Īpparently the. Software replaces version 1, and that version 3 replaces both 1 and 2.Įach later version includes everything in the prior versions, so that Normally, it’s safe to assume that version 2 of some NET framework versions installed on my machine Opting not to actually include it in their distributions, but insteadĪsk you to download and install it if you don’t already have the Large, and because it’s also fairly common these days, many vendors are
Include it on its CD or in its download, and install it automatically Nothing more than software vendors can include it in the software theyĭeliver to you. NET framework isĪvailable in what are called “redistributable packages”, which means NETįramework are pre-installed on some versions of Windows.Ī program you install might install it. NET, soĬhances are actually pretty high that you have at least one and perhaps Over time, more and more programs have come to rely on. So you may well have programs installed on your machine that rely on Languages to perform common tasks, most commonly things that involve Of functionality that can be used by programs written in those Users of Microsoft’s newer versions of programming languages like C#, That can be used by programs so that they don’t all have to re-write
To grossly oversimplify, it’s a package of common support software Have installed might require one version or the other, but in my WeĬould go through a long exhaustive search to see which programs you It possible that youĭo, in fact, need all those different versions of. To cut to the chase: I wouldn’t delete a thing. NET versioning, unfortunately, is apparently a mess. NET is most likely used by other software you have installed on The fact that you don’t develop software actually has nothing to do
0 kommentar(er)
